Richard wrote:
>
> I have narrowed my decision to either the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 or the 28-135
> f/3.5-5.6 IS. I'm looking for opinions on either of these two. Does either
> one have perform significantly better then the other? Does the "IS" really
> work? Does it degrade the image when in use?
Hello Richard,
I've had the 28-135 IS for a few months now, and am very pleased with
it. I don't have the experience to give you much of a qualitative report,
but IMHO the sharpness and contrast is excellent for the price range of
the lens. The image stabilization really does work ... I'd guess it give
the equivalent of one, maybe two f-stops.
-Nick
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
