From: Bill Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hello Bill

> It looks like it was Daniel Rocca again, if one follows the link. Please

Yes, it's me Daniel Rocha (not with 2 "c" but "ch") :)

> note that the 70-200 IS news is incorrect, it was quickly changed to news
> of a more weatherproofed 70-200 f/2.8 L, but not with IS.

There is a confusion here !

Your are refering to a news from the 12/12/00 which said that a 70-200 2,8
sealed have replaced the old version.

But the actual news from the 08 february 2001, is a complete new
information, which comes with the infos about the 2 news TCs from the _same_
source ! I hope that the 70-200 2,8L IS USM will be annonced at the PMA, but
of course I can't bet on it ! :(((

The prices are also given and they are perhaps more than a rumour !

Just wait & see (stronger than never !)

-- PhOTo -- vOYaGe -- GrAPhiSMe --
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to