--- Pierre Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What surprises me is that the magnification ratios > of these two lenses are > almost the same (0.14 for the 20mm vs 0.13 for the > 20-35) while their > closest focusing distances are quite different. Because the highest magnification of the 20-35 is not at 20mm but at 35mm. With a longer focal length your minimum distance can be bigger compared to a lens with a shorter focal length and same max. magnification. Robert __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- RE: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Chuck Skinner
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Jim Davis
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Julian Loke
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Jim Davis
- EOS Photographing dogs Karen Nakamura
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Robert Meier
- EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Jim Davis
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
