Pierre Bellavance wrote: > And should I also take into consideration the fact that I already own the > 28-135 lens, so I only "need" 20-24? If I were making the decision, this would definitely be a factor. fcc * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re[2]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Jim Davis
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Skip
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Ken Lin
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Jason Waghorn
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Tim Munro
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Jansen
