<<You two guys are making life impossible for me!!!
I had decided to go for the 20/2.8 and there you are convincing me
that I
should get the 20-35/3.5-4.5.>>
The problem with taking anyone's advise for anything is that
ultimately it is your decision.
I let myself be pursuaded early on to buy some after-market lenses
(well, they were cheaper) but principally they were given "lens of the
year" status and there were those extolling thier virtue on line.
Guess what: they were crap (comparatively).
You don't know what anyone means by sharp till you have seen thier
work. When someone says (no vignetting) do you know whether they are
talking about full frame of the middle 70% (utilised by D&P printing
of negative).
But before you part with money I hope you decide what it is YOU want
to do with the lens. That in essence dictates which you should go
for.
BobT
I got the 20mm: why? It was more expensive than the 20-35. Dumb?
Maybe but it was one of those "buy the body and get a lens" offers
;o)
I have not regretted it. It does vignette a bit wide open. I would
wager a LOT of money that the 20-35 does too. Depends how you define
vignette I guess.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
