From: "Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I liked the close focusing of the 20/2.8 a lot... but would I use it often > at 9.5 inches instead of 13 inches? Don't forget that the focus distance is measured from the film plane, not from the front of the glass - if the 20-35 is a longer lens than the 20/2.8 then that will account for at least some of the difference in focusing distance..... Just my $0.02 Oh and I've never felt the need for a superwide lens yet so I'll await your decision :-) Jason * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Jim Davis
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Skip
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Ken Lin
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Jason Waghorn
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Tim Munro
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Jansen
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Russell
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re[2]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
- Re[2]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re[3]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
