Michael Quack wrote:
>
>
> Sadly enough: No. I have never seen anything as sharp as my
> old FDn 3.5/135 mm telephoto in EF, and the EF 2.5/50 mm compact
> macro offers handling advantages, but the FDn 3.5/50 mm macro
> was the better lens both for mechanical and optical reasons.
That's an interesting statement. That old FDn 3.5/135 must be
a mighty impressive lens if it is better than the EF 2/135L. Was it
really *that* good? Some magazines said it was the "best lens tested
ever" at the time they tested it. Then again, magazines tend to hype
new products. Just wondering...
Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
