Michael Quack wrote:
> > I had an old FD50/1.8 (1981-83 vintage that was purchased
> > with an AE-1) that exhibited *terrible* flare performance,
>
> This lens was certainly new FD, and it was certainly SSC
> multi coated.
To the best of my knowledge, the various versions of 50/1.8 never had "more"
than the SC coating.
> > What other jewels are there in the FD lineage that have
> > been lost?
>
> The FD new 4.0/70-210 zoom.
FD 35-105/3.5.
fcc
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
