Bob Sull wrote:
> "Grant W. Westerson" wrote:
> >
> > I recently purchased an EOS 3 body and have started the long learning curve.
> > Any suggestions for an inexpensive (non-Canon) AF long lens (400mm) that
> > would be suitable for nature and sports photography? I'd like to stay in
> > the $400-600US bracket
> > Thanks for input.
>
> I believe that the glass in front of the body is more important than the
> body so I try to stay with Canon glass. So far I have with a 300 f/4L
> being my longest lens right now.
I agree with Bob, and would like to suggest looking for a second-hand 300/4L and
then adding the 1.4x extender at a later time, when finances permit. Not only will
you get excellent optics and AF, you'll have more versatility: an outstanding
300/4, and an excellent 420/5.6. KEH currently has a 300/4L for $819 (compared to
$649 for the Sigma 400/5.6 HSM from B&H).
fcc
PS: IMO the EOS 3 does not have a particularly steep learning curve.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
