Thomas Bantel wrote:
> > The lack of E-TTL alone is enough to avoid the Elan, but there is
> > worse!
>
> Well, I believe it is enough reason for you. Still, I'm not a believer
> when it comes to E-TTL. While it is likely to make significantly less
> flash exposure errors than plain TTL, it is still not comparable to
> using an external flash meter.
Ah . . . so what do you do when you can't walk up to that elk with your
flashmeter in hand? Or when you need a little fill on that bird that's going to
fly away at any second?
;-)
fcc
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
