On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 20:05:04 -0400, you wrote:
>> Tell me more about C-41 B&W films. That didn't exist the last time I
>shot a lot of B&W.
>
>Photo numbers 2&3 in this album were shot with Kodak's C-41 process B&W film
>and scanned "as is" (note the result is not true B&W):
>http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=693666&a=9434840
>
>This photo was taken on the same roll but scanned as B&W:
>http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=693666&a=5054640&p=32034004
>
>All three photos were taken with my Canon Rebel 2000 with a Canon EF
>75-300mm f/4-5.6 zoom lens on the sports setting.
>
Thanks Pattie, that makes it very clear. I can imagine some
situations that the C-41 film would be very interesting - kind of an
"historical" or journalistic look.
Appreciate the post, and good pics!
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
