Thomas Bantel wrote:
> All I can add to this topic is, that my 200/2.8 has a very
> nice bokeh IMHO. The 80-200/2.8 L, which is the predecessor
> of the 70-200/2.8 Ian Stanley is testing right now, is not
> as smooth as the prime. The 50/1.4 and 85/1.8 are also quite
> good at that (bokeh) IMHO, also the 28-70/2.8 L.
Okay, EOSers, which lenses in the EOS line exhibit the smoothest (and
least distracting) bokeh in your experience?
I would guess the following L lenses would be candidates: 85/1.2,
135/2, and 200/1.8. But I'd love to hear more observations from
those who've used the glass (following Thomas' lead above). What
about the 100/2 for example? Or the 180/3.5 macro, which has
received some criticism in this regard?
Are there any dogs in the lineup to watch out for (other than the
cheaper zooms)?
Thanks,
Dan
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
