Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone had used both bodies, - 3 and 1n, and could tell me
if 3 is really up to 1n's level when it comes to durability. Is it as well
sealed as Canon says it is? I have heard some users say that it's not. But
maybe it varies from sample to sample. Did anyone put their 3 trough some
rainy conditions, or trips where gear had to go through some good bumping,
maybe even falls? I know no camera is 100% protected from all that, but 1n
proved to be a number one choice for EOS users in those conditions. So, any
comparison/feedback on 3 on this would be appreciated.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************