Hugo wrote:
> I've not used EOS 1n (only EOS-1),
> but I have hard time believing anything else than what Canon sain. I.e.
> that EOS 3 is everybit as though and sealed as EOS 1n.
I have to say that although the EOS 3 is tough, it's not as tough as an EOS 1n... The
EOS 1n has an inner metal shell that makes it more impact resistant than the EOS 3.
The 1-series also has redundant wiring all around, so if one wire comes off, the
camera still works... But with taht said, the EOS 3 is plenty good enough for all but
the hardcore photog who needs a camera/weapon...
I saw a toughness-demo of the 1V once... The Canon-rep dropped the body from 2+ meters
onto a concrete floor, picked it up, bent the flash-shoe out again with a screwdriver
(it had bent on impact), attached a 50/1.4 and did a full demo of what the camera
could do... I allmost came on the spot... Too bad I couldn't afford it at the time
(they sold brand new bodies at 25% off MSRP at the show)...
Snorre
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
