On Sat, 4 Aug 2001 12:38:14 -0700 (PDT), you wrote: > >--- Robert Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > I don't think IS be extremely useful for macro >> photography. >> > It is often the object movement, not the camera >> movement, >> > what causes troubles. > >Now if only Canon could figure out a way to image >stabilize the SUBJECT, then we'd really have something <g>. > Hmmm, built-in tranquilizer gun? Ken * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? thomas . tanida
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Gary Russell
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Martijn Stol
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? lmichael
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Terry Danks
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Keith Green
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Bob Turner
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Keith Green
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Grega Fenko
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Rafal Walas
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? BlueSky
