From: Ray Amos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Which brings up my biggest complaint about the 100-400, background
> blur. As much as I love the zoom, the 300 f/4 IS has noticeably better
> background blur. Neither is outstanding. The only other complaint I
> have is the push-pull zoom. You get used to it, but I like the ring
> zooms better. If you need exact composition, the ring is much faster
> and more accurate.
It's why (also) the 70-200 2,8L IS USM is awaited !
The new design seems to be quite interesting !
(...)
> As I have noted before, if you really want to see how much this lens is
> liked by the pros, go to Ding Darling in Florida and you'll see twenty
> five tripods lined up toe-to-toe and almost everyone there has a 100-400
> around their neck, even the Nikon shooters. It's a perfect "bird in
> flight" lens.
Interesting... I have not thought that the 100-400 IS is so much appreciated
by pro sport shooters
<�+�> PhOTo <�+�> GrAPhiSMe <�+�>
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha
Groupe fran�ais Canon EOS :
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/canoneos_fr/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
