harrison mcclary wrote (edited):
Hey, Chip, you sure have me thinking about seriously looking before selling
the 70-200 and getting the new IS version. Guess I will have to borrow or
rent an IS to test next to my non IS and see which is best in my
applications.
Thanks for your detailed response.
--
Harrison McClary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harrison,
How are you? You are thinking as I am. If the 70-200mm IS version is not as
sharp as the non-IS 70-200mm, why change? Hopefully Canon did a good job as
they did with the 30mm F2.8 L IS, but if they engineered it like the 300mm
F4L IS, forget it!
Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
