On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 21:33:01 -0400, you wrote: >I'm sorry. I meant sharpness and contrast. I used the wrong word. The >MTF graph of the 100-400 @ 300 is the same as the 300 IS at the same f >stop. In other words, the resulting images created by each lens should >be practically indistinguishable from the other. MTF graphs don't address contrast, do they? Ken * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non... Robert Meier
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non... Ray Amos
- RE: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non IS Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non IS canon
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non IS Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non IS Dave Herzstein
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non... Robert Meier
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non... lmichael
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non IS Ray Amos
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non IS Ray Amos
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non... Daniel ROCHA
- Re: FW: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non ... GreenScreen
- Re: FW: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non ... Ken Durling
- Re: FW: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs.... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Sharpness of 300 mm f4 IS vs. non IS YEGEY
