Tom DelRosario wrote:

> I have been a cheapskate with my lenses, owning only a 50/1.8; 35-80/4-5.6 (came 
>with my previous body); and a 75-300.  After doing some comparisons between the 50 
>and 35-80, I decided that I needed a new lens.  Being a cheapskate, I got the 
>28-105/3.5-4.5 II.  (Still spent less on lenses than the typical L series lens).  
>While I haven't done any direct comparisons yet, I do have some initial thoughts.
>
> * USM really doesn't seem that special.  Yes, it is quieter than the 50/1.8, but it 
>is no faster in achieving focus.
>
> * However, the manual focus ring acutally feels good.  The other lenses I own have 
>really crappy manual focus modes.  With FTM and CF4, I can just leave the lens in AF 
>mode when I want and manually focus if I find a good situation for it.
>
> * The general build quality of the lens seems to be much better than the other 
>lenses I own.  However, it is a little more difficult to mount onto the camera.  
>Since it does mount, I don't think it is any problem, but it does require more force 
>to get it on the camera.
>
> * With all the talk about the low-light focusing ability of the Elan 7/7e, I must 
>say that I took some shots at a party this weekend.  The lights were really low and 
>it would have been impossible to manually focus in that light.  With the 420EX on the 
>camera, I was able to acheive focus with no more trouble than I would have had in 
>daylight.  Unfortunately, I didn't think to take off the flash to test the low-light 
>focusing ability to make a direct comparison.  My guess, though is that I would not 
>have been able to focus without the blinking AF assist.  The shoe-mounted flash is a 
>great addition to the camera for that type of situation.
>

--
Comparing the focus speed of the 28-105 USM and the 50mm 1.8 isn't really an apples to 
apples kind of comparison.  A fixed focal length lens will generally focus faster than 
a zoom, the shorter the focal length, the faster it will probably focus.  Compare the 
focus speed of the 28-105 to that of your 35-80. It is hard for me to say 
definitively, since the only non USM lens I have is the 50mm 1.8, but you should see a 
marked difference.
Skip
*********************************************************************
    SHADOWCATCHER IMAGERY

Fine Art Black and White Photography
 http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
    Skip and Heather Middleton
*********************************************************************


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to