I mainly shoot slides, where that might be more obvious. What are your experineces with that?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Durling > > >Hi Jean-Marc! > > > >Interesting opinion. I was thinking that the zoom should produce > "similar" > >results than my 50/1.8. It's true about the price though. > > > I think it depends on enlargement. I have only gone up to 8x10 with > either lens, and it this size it's very hard to tell the difference. > The 28-135 is much sharper than it "should be" as a zoom! And yes, I > have shots taken at dawn with the lens wide open and you can see the > hide pattern on the cows on a distant hillside. > > By the way, I've had mine for about a year now, with no kid glove > treatment, and no problems. The zoom does creep out a bit when hung > around your neck and walking vigorously, but I now have a reflex > motion to reel it back in. > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
