>Harrison, > >For me, you really have hit the nail on the head. > >I don't want to think another format. > >A recurring problem for me, with medium format, is the lack of ultra wide >lenses. I then "think" 35mm. > >I have a considerable investment in Canon glass. I wouldn't have bought a >14mm if I didn't need 104 degrees. On the D60 it becomes like a 20mm+. A >�2000 lens for a �400 angle of view with poorer resolution. > >I can understand the multiplier being a plus for some. But if the framing is >a little loose then we can crop. If you can't get it all in then what? >Photostitch? I don't think so. > >I have to buy a digital camera. My clients are starting to request digital >origination. So I'm stuck between a rock and hard place. 1D with its low >multiplier and resolution or D60 with its higher res and multiplier. I want >the best of both worlds. Not too much to ask, is it? > >Did someone say "Contax"?
Wasn't the Kodak DCS something or other a full frame 6 mpix chip? Back then it was a 30,000 dollar camera, but now is much less I am sure. -- Harrison McClary http://www.mcclary.net * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
