Hi Peter, 105 vs 135 really does not make that much of a difference imho for portraits purposes. both of these are slow lenses for portrait work.
28-135 is not really sharper then 28-105. or even my Tokina 28-80 2.8. All of them have advantages and disadvantages. I have all three of these lenses. I will keep the Tokina 2.8 since it is 2.8 but still debating the 28-105 vs 28-135.... IS is really nice to have, but then 28-105 is so much cheaper and it is lightweight! > -----Original Message----- > In one word, YES! The extra 30mm is ideal for portraits, the > glass is sharp, > and .... oops that's more than one word, so let me add two...BUT IT! > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
