I didn't get peter's original email, so i can only see this part: > > As to sharpness, its the old saga again and again. Check > out the list below > > which are the test results from Photodo comparing the > 28-105mm v. 28-135mm > > IS. In every case the 28-135IS is sharper and has a bit less less > > distortion throghout the range.
Peter, I understand where you are coming from, however : I do not care about what photodo says if I have my own test. I looked at 4000dpi scans from a test i conducted. all the three lenses i mentioned were very very similar, i had to nit pick to find much difference. I was going to procude a write up but i do not have time for it, and since they are at very similar levels, i do not see any need to. at certain extremes, one was better then the other, but none of them was clearly better then the others. they were very very close to each other. I can't see any difference at 4000dpi scans, so maybe theoritically one is a tad bit sharper at certain points. but that should not be a consideration if you can not experience it in real life. cheers. e * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
