I don't think there's any optical difference between Mks I & II of the EF 200 f2.8L. I have the Mk I and the built-in lens hood is a joke - otherwise it's a fine lens. I always try to have with me a Hoya rubber tele hood for when it's necessary!
Malcolm Milton Keynes, UK ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:02 AM Subject: Re: EOS Telezoom dilemma > > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > >> I'm currently > >> considering the 200/2.8 (second hand), > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Where did you see the lens second hand in the Netherlands, and for what > price. > > Hi Erwin, > > I've seen this lens in a shop in Enschede, called 'Second Hand camera'. > They do have a homepage, although I get the feeling it's not updated that > often. > > http://www.secondhandcameras.nl/ > > Over the past year I have watched their occasions and they have had three > 200/2.8 L's (only mark I, with built in hood). Price was around 550 euros. snip * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
