> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kotsinadelis,
>
>> Robert Meier wrote (edited for space):
>> I had the 28-135 only for a few months and not at the same time as the
>> 80-200/2.8 which makes a comparison more difficult. Anyways, the
>> 80-200/2.8
>> does focus considerable faster then the 28-135.
> I disagree. I have the 28-135mm IS lens and it is very fast AF, I
> also have
> (on loan) a Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L and I do not see the AF any
> faster than
> the 28-135mm IS lens. In fact, I think the 28-135 is faster
> probably due to
> its lower mass.
Well, I guess then either memory doesn't serve me right and/or it is because
I haven't owned the two lenses at the same time and/or it is because I
haven't used the 28-135 very much. Anyway, what I sure did like about the
28-135 is the IS. That comes quite handy if you shoot handheld especially
with small apartures. But then again I use my tripod most of the time.
Rob
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
