>I had testet my EOS 3 body (because I bought it second-hand), and the >service stated that it underexposes max. 1/2 EV. The deviation isn't >consistent, sometimes smaller, eg. 1/3 at certain amount of light and 1/2 >at other EVs. He also said that it is within the official acceptance >interval, so the camera need no repair. I may use +1/3 exp. compensation, >if I wish (or adjust the ISO setting). > >Are there any official statement about how narrow (or wide) should be this >acceptance interval, how much deviation is allowed from the optimum? > >The camere was manufactured in 2001 July ( OOO711). > >Thanks, Zoli
Can't answer, but as an additional comment: When I had my old EOS-3 checked they said that it was -0.5 EV through the scale "not like normally when the amount of underexposure changes over the range". So you seem to have a "normal" underexposure case while I had consistent -0,5 stops error. Vesa _________________________________________________________________ Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
