> The 70-200/2.8 does not need such a big filter so I assume neigther does the > 28-70/2.8.
You're right, it doesn't. When I said 82mm as a joke, I was responding to Chip Louie's suggested but still imaginary wish list item 28-105 2.8L. --Ken S. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
