> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Sarno
>
> > The 70-200/2.8 does not need such a big filter so I assume neigther
> does the
> > 28-70/2.8.
>
> You're right, it doesn't. When I said 82mm as a joke, I was responding
> to Chip Louie's suggested but still imaginary wish list item 28-105
> 2.8L.

Oops, I meant to write 28-105/2.8. It probably would still be 77mm. All the
2.8 zooms (16-35, 28-70, 70-200) have 77mm filters so a 24-105/2.8 probably
also would have a 77mm filter.

Robert

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to