> I have no interest in > prolonging this discussion. Then why did you reply at all ... ?
As to badmouthing a fine machine - I assure you my criticism of it has not changed. The BS about it "being technically impossible to create full frame 35mm sensors" The BS about smaller sensors being somehow better than large ones because they remove the cropping options from the photographer ... I have always maintained that. It's not a sudden shift from supporting to slagging. Technically the cameras are fantastic - all that research though and they still fall short of what we already had for quality. They win for convenince though by a mile. There is nothing magic about 35mm - in the progress of film there were smaller formats that failed. It sits at round about the right compromise between portability and quality. The quality limit is almost all physics: no matter what sensor/film you use. For some types of photography large formats (film or digital) will always win. For people content to only view images over the web - 35mm may be overkill. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
