I guess I must be one of the "weird one percent". My personal passion is photographing Swiss trains and visiting the main depots of some of the regional private lines such as the BLS and the RhB. I have been able to take pictures of the driver's cab and internal electrical machinery of locomotives using my 14mm (and later the 16mm end of the 16-35) with bounce flash. There is nowhere to back up and even 20mm begins to crop some important features. I own an EOS-1D because I got it at a spectacular price on ebay but my EOS-3 has been my main camera. I keep wondering if I have to take both along next time. I would think my dilemma must extend to anyone who does a lot of interior shooting. John --- "Icoz, Evrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How many times did you REALLY need a shot in that > range? HOw many film > photographers have a 14mm lens? > > There are advantages/disadvantages to each 'tool'. > What does a film > photographer do when he has an ISO 100 in his camera > when he needs ISO 800? > etc. etc. > > For me, I just step back a little, or use film. The > times I actually really > needed a 14mm is non-existant. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Lovda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > One thing I haven't figured out is what does a > > "digital" photographer do if he/she really needs a > > shot in the 14mm to 18mm range? Do they have to > keep > > an old Rebel 2000 film body and scan the slides? > > John
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
