----- Original Message ----- From: "Petr� Sebastian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:06 AM Subject: RE: EOS Canon 20-35 f3.5-4.5 vs. Sigma 17-35 f2.8-4
Thank you for your mail. Can you say more about mechanical construction? Is Sigma reliable? Do you have any problems with dust? I�ve heard that in comparison with Canon is Sigma worse. But it maybe sporadic opinion. Sebastian * I believe there is a tendency for people who own (more)expensive lenses to create negative rumours about similar lower-priced equipment. It may be that they have to justify to themselves the extra money they paid for it. I am not denying that lets say Canon has the advantage over Sigma but some people overdo it... * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
