----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Zendel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > My wife and I had IVF and now have a beautiful daughter, though we named her > Esme, not Minolta...... .......................... > IME, they are reliable and consistent, though they underexpose at the > factory setting. I have about +0.5 exposure compensation permanently set. ......................... > FWIW, on the last 2 occasions when the difference was about 1 stop, the > camera was better!!!!
Hi Craig, Congrat's on the daughter. Dunno about the name thing though - I reckon Minolta Zendel has a star quality to it... Your comment on underexposure is interesting as this meter is consistently under compared to the 1v. I think I agree on the spot attachment being unnecessary as I already have one in the camera. I will do a more rigid test tomorrow with a couple of rolls of Provia and see what results I get on the lightbox. I don't really like acquiring gear just for the sake of it as it's just more to cart around. Thanks for the info. Tim * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
