On 2 Mar 2003 at 7:51, Michael D Early wrote:

> > On 1 Mar 2003 at 16:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I have been thinking of actually purchasing a Canon 600 f4 IS...a
> >> large purchase.  With all this talk of new digital cameras and
> >> potential new lens lines are there any thoughts about what might
> >> happen to the value of such a lens?  What do you think?  Is this a
> terrible time to be
> >> buying such a lens?  Is this even an answerable question?
> 
> First of all, I agree that a used lens would be a much better find if
> it were available.  Second, it seems to me that most people by a lens
> of this length for its reach.  That reach it enhanced with most
> digital cameras on the market (other than the EOS 1Ds) -- that lens on
> a D30 or D60 ( and D10?) would function like a 900mm f4 or on a 1D
> like a 780mm f4 and if you want the reach then that is quite a lens. 
> If you decide to resale, then I am afraid that you might have more of
> a problem with folks that would look at a 500 f4IS which is quite a
> bit cheaper (and lighter) as a better buy since it "could" be
> considered a 800 or 650 depending on the camera body.  And, lest
> anyone think this is not an issue, I just returned from a North
> America Nature Photography Association meeting where a number of
> working pro's were saying they are seriously considering adding a
> digital body for the extra reach for those tough wild animal shots --
> even though most of them would also tell you that they don't like the
> concept of digital as most of their editors are still insisting on
> chromes.

Such photographers are sitting ducks (pun intended) for the marketing 
concept of a half-frame (18x24mm) analog camera, as in the old days.
Perhaps some genius could even craft Minox-film into an EOS 
body....8-))

(this site doesn't let the quality difference between 1D and 1Ds to 
the imagination either:
http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/Eos1Ds/build/building.htm


--                 
Bye,

Willem-Jan Markerink

      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to