--- Jim Davis Nature Photography <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Al Ruscelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: > > >Again, I just wanted to throw this info into the mix of this thread. > >Just an eye-opening experience from the standpoint of comparing > digital > >to film in a given circumstance. > > It's hard for me to imagine a circumstance where film is better. > Especially if we're talking 35mm film. Sports, nature, concerts, all > better with digital. And i believe portraits too. I'm sure there are > some photogs out there that will argue this, but they likely don't > have an EOS digital. > > > Jim Davis > - checkout the Motorcycle Headlight Relay Kit at: > http://jimdavis.oberro.com/html/bike_acc_.html
Well, I certainly wouldn't argue even though not having digital body yet. Just from obvious reasons: too pricey for a kind of body I would be willing to part from my EOS-3 for (full frame, tough case SLR). Otherwise, something like 1Ds would certainly be my way to go... :-) Alex __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
