On 29 Nov 2003 at 21:37, Pattie Anderson wrote:
> > > How about the 3D or D3 that's been rumoured for so long now?
> > > Leave the 12 mega pixels 1Ds for the real pros who can afford or
> > > justify it, and give the rest of us pro-sumer what the EOS-3
> > > provided in the film body range.
> > >
> > > Off the soap box.....
> >
> > As long as it's full-frame!!
> > (I guess it's that time of year again for a wishlist ;-)
>
> I'd love to have the EOS-3's focusing *with* the 1.6x factor! I know
> it is bothersome to many, but it is great for shooting sports in my
> experience.
>
> The focusing on my 10D leaves a lot to be desired as compared to my
> EOS-3. Not enough for me to go back to shooting film, though.
Even an DCS-3 from 1994 does better in the focus department....;))
(being based on an 1N)
Yep, that's 10 years by now....;))
Actually, Kodak could have made quite a bit of money by only
upgrading the digi-part/CCD of these earlier Canon/Kodak camera's, to
the current level.
I wonder whether the contracts between them forbid that....
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
