Citeren Hugo Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For those of you who can read French, buy a copy of this month's "Chasseur > D'Images" (http://www.photim.net/Numeros/SommaireMois.htm ). They have a > long article on how digital cameras and lenses can't be tested in the same > way has film cameras (I haven't read it all yet). Them they test the EOS > 1Ds > and EOS 300D combined with several Canon and Sigma lenses and surprise: > the > 300D gets better test results than the 1Ds! I was really surprised to read > this. Has anyone on this list had the chance to compare both cameras? > Hi,
Is this because the 1Ds has much more 'resolving power' and thus nails 'bad lenses' down? The 300D is more forgiving, achieving better results with not so superb lenses? Does this mean for example a 135 f/2 even grows with a 1Ds? Greetings Leeuwtje -- _____________________________________________________________________ Zon Gratis ADSL. De voordelen van gratis internet met de snelheid van ADSL. Zonder abonnementskosten en zonder vast contract. Je betaalt alleen voor de tijd online. Nu zonder aansluitkosten en met gratis modem. Bestel snel op zonnet.nl. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
