[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Citeren Thomas Bantel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Now, there are quite a few surprises. While the 135/2 tested quite good
with an EOS 1Ds, the 200/2.8 came out as not recommended. Don't know why,
with my analog SLRs it's a superb lens.



Thomas,

Did they also test the 70-200 f/4? Together with the 135 f/2 it's on my 'to buy' list.

Greetings
Leeuwtje



I don't know by heart, will look it up until tomorrow.


Thomas Bantel

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to