[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/replied to: >Is this because the 1Ds has much more 'resolving power' and thus nails 'bad >lenses' down? >The 300D is more forgiving, achieving better results with not so superb >lenses? >Does this mean for example a 135 f/2 even grows with a 1Ds?
Actually, the 10d has more dense pixels on the imaging chip. Perhaps that's the reason it's getting better results. The 1DS has an image that basically sees more around the edges of 10d image. new stuff on 10d here: http://jimdavis.oberro.com/galleries/new_stuff2/new_stuff_1.html -- Jim Davis Nature Photography http://jimdavis.oberro.com Replies in plain text only please! * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
