> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Bantel > > As you say, there are several possibilities why a 1Ds would give "worse" > results than a 300D. Bigger sensor/smaller pixels of the 1Ds, which means > > a) More resolving power > b) Light rays for peripheral pixels come in at a higher angle, which is > a problem for most digital sensors, while it works perfectly well with > film.
Also the 1Ds uses the bigger part of the lens. Due to the smaller sensor of the 300D it uses the central part of the lens which performs better, especially in wide angle lenses. Robert * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
