"Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: > hardley seems fair, but the 70-200 should be sharper.
Of course it is. And Photodo will of course show the difference in numerical form. In the real world, very few shooters will ever obtain any quantifiable difference in their final prints. The 100-400L IS is not a tripod lens. Using it as such is just dumb. It's a walk around hand holding miracle in a compact and relatively inexpensive lens. This is how I use it, and I find my images very sharp. If I handheld the 70-200 in the same situation, my images might look slightly sharper but I really really doubt it. I know my subjects would look 4 times smaller :-) -- Need a brighter headlight the safe way? Get a MOTORCYCLE HEADLIGHT RELAY KIT at: http://jimdavis.oberro.com/html/bike_acc_.html I'm a BMW rider and enthusiast. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
