> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Meyer > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EOS Do I Really Need IS ? > > > > --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't have it on > > the Sigma, why should I have it on the Canon? > > > > Your input appreciated. > > Because it will give you sharper images under more > conditions when shooting handheld? Because it will > increase the number of shutter speed & light level > options you have when shooting handheld? Because it > does a wonderful job when panning? > > ===== > Bob Meyer > I wish I knew what I know now, when I was younger... > >
But Bob, Peter K. says the Sigma 70-200 2.8HSM is just as sharp or sharper than Canon's EF 70-200 2.8L IS, and that IS is useless for sports and moving subjects. Never mind that virtually every other person who has used both has said the Canon EF 70-200 2.8L IS is sharper and much faster focusing and that IS simply clinches the decision. Never mind that almost every lens test seems to show the Canon EF 70-200 2.8L IS as clearly superior to the Sigma 70-200 2.8HSM. Shouldn't we believe him? You started it now we'll have to listen to him on this all over again. 8^) Cheers/Chip * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
