Thys wrote: > I just feel I have to set some facts straight here because > many people come here to look for advice on equipment to buy. > I bought Sigma based on the 'good' advice of some here and on > other lists and were badly bitten. Sigma makes GREAT products > - on PAPER. Their quality control STINKS and so does their > service. If you have a good one - well good for you. I've > said it before and I'll say it again - with Canon it only > hurts once. I have the experiences to prove it.
So you got advice from a lot of people here and on other lists that Sigma was good, but because *you* had a bad experience, you discount the experience of all of those other people, and only your experience is relevant? Sorry, that doesn't make sense to me. I'm not discounting your bad experience, but it sounds like a lot of other people are happy with their Sigma lenses, making you the exception rather than the rule. I think those are the "straight facts." YMMV, Pattie * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
