----- Original Message -----
From: "Pattie Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>No, I did not say that, so please don't misquote me. I am saying that by
>your own admission, a lot of other people are happy with Sigma. So
claiming
>you are setting "facts straight" by insisting that *all* of their products
>and service are terrible is NOT setting the record straight.
Don't think I said 'all', did I?. But - It certainly is a very high
percentage (by modern QC standards) of Sigma products that are faulty or
poorly designed. I have proved it and other people on this (and privately
and on other sites) have proved/supported it. I just felt that new buyers
should take note of that when they read lists like these and rather go with
the Canon (or Nikon or whatever) or with some other 3rd party manufacturer
like Tamron, Tokina, Metz etc. I am not knocking your Sigma (which you are
obviously happy with) but just trying to warn new buyers that they should
beware of Sigma if they can.
> Feel free to
>tell people about your bad experience,
I certainly intend to.
---------------------------------------------------------
Thys van der Merwe
Portfolio of African Images:
http://www.zulpa.co.za
Cell: (+27) 83-441-3108
Tel: (+27) 35-753-3766
Fax: (+27) 35-753-4489
-----------------------------------------------------------
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
