----- Original Message -----
From: "Pattie Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So you got advice from a lot of people here and on other lists that Sigma
> was good, but because *you* had a bad experience, you discount the
> experience of all of those other people, and only your experience is
> relevant?
Don't get me wrong - I'm not blaming anyone but myself for making the stupid
decision to spend money on Sigma again. And, my bad experience is
continuing - now they want me to send them my EOS3 "because certain features
on the EF500DG might not be compatible with the camera and they need to
check" (according to the repair technician) This company is a JOKE!
>
> Sorry, that doesn't make sense to me. I'm not discounting your bad
> experience, but it sounds like a lot of other people are happy with their
> Sigma lenses, making you the exception rather than the rule. I think
those
> are the "straight facts."
>
When you randomly buy 4 products from a company over a period of several
years and something is wrong with all 4 products and the company
purposefully drags their feet with service and response - You are saying
that I should just shut up and feel happy that I'm the 'exception' and not
the rule??!
---------------------------------------------------------
Thys van der Merwe
Portfolio of African Images:
http://www.zulpa.co.za
Cell: (+27) 83-441-3108
Tel: (+27) 35-753-3766
Fax: (+27) 35-753-4489
-----------------------------------------------------------
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************