On Wednesday July 28 2004 7:05 pm, Gary Fisher wrote: > So that leaves (to me) the advantage of > less changing of lenses. �Not that big a > deal *most* times. �Given that the backup > body I'd want would also be digital (a cheap > one if such an animal exists - maybe in the > not too distant future?), I've spent the money > on glass instead. �Not carrying 2 bodies means > I can either travel lighter or carry an extra > lens or two. > > Pro usage of course would be different to my > amateur requirements.... > > Opinions anyone?
If you just want a backup, I'd the Rebel dSLR. Fred -- "Ballmer is no more designed for the art of persuasion than the Abrams tank is for delivering meals on wheels." * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
