Hi Willem-Jan, > ...only on the inclusion of the admin-footer,
If the admin footer is included (the part that has the "*"s and the "for list instructions") the post will be rejected? If so, I must have missed where it said not to do that in the instructions. Better read them again... > which is a sure sign of sloppy-quoting Well, it's a pretty short footer, and sure, in the days of slow modems, this sure made a difference, but today, with most people being on broadband, this shorty footer really isn't going to clog up the network, so though it's a sign of not anal snipping, I'd be hard pressed to call it "sloppy". Regards, Austin * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
