On 22 Apr 2007 at 10:00, Jane Waters wrote:
>
> --- Wayne S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At 09:59 AM 4/17/2007, you wrote:
> > >Someone in my photo class pointed this out to me. I'd have to
> > >resort to a credit card, so there is no reasonable way I can buy it
> > >after my two lens purchases in the past month.
> > >
> > >http://cgi.ebay.com/xxxxxxxx
> >
> > Just tell yourself it doesn't have IS until the urge passes.
> >
> > WayneS
>
> Might be fast, but without IS it's still hard to handle... wait,
> child. Your day will come :-) My money is on the 70-200 2.8 IS. Yes,
> it's a tad slower, but it was worth every dollar spent. You sound like
> me... only I'm waitin for the 1Ds Mark III and then I'll have to fork
> over money for all new lenses, since the rumor seems to be firming up
> around the issue of a new lens mount...
Might have been possible before MF-DSLR's were launched, but would be
a far too large commercial risk for Canon nowadays.
Remember, the S/N-ratio of a larger chip/pixel will always be
better....
(and with more than one 28mm announced, even the old wide-angle
limits of MF have vanished....)
If I had to start from scratch today, my choice might very well have
been a Mamiya ZD....;))
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
