What's so hard to understand about two guys with two different bodies (a 1.0x and 1.6x) and identical lenses taking a photo from the exact same location? That's the only scenario where his argument comes close to holding water. You've been so busying trying to get him to clarify and clarify and clarify his scenario when it was about as simple as can be from the beginning. That is just as much an "exact same image" as your scenario is.
Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 6:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: EOS Pixels and silly questions Well, we don't know WHAT Peter's scenario actually is. He hasn't stated it with enough detail, but Tom brought up a good point, that Peter did say "side by side", and therefore in order to get the "same exact image[s]" we would need two different focal lengths picked such that the images were the "same exact image[s]". And this, as I pointed out in my reply to Tom, means that "speculated" scenario doesn't follow. IOW, standing side by side, with the "same exact image[s]" (therefore differing focal lengths) will give the higher image pixel density to the 12MP, not the 10MP. For his "scenario" to be right, he has to have a different meaning of "the same exact image". Regards, Austin * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
