Hi Peter, > > ... The explanations I've given are correct (and others have > > confirmed this as well), so the only thing that can be at odds > > here is what the premises we are going by are (or some basic > > misunderstanding of physics/operation), and I've clearly stated > > my premises and you haven't said yours are any different...
> LOL. And others confirmed you are correct? Good try. Bob Wise's, Tom Pfeiffer's, Huang Shao Hui's and Andrew Blankertz's responses say the same thing I've been saying. So, yes, Peter, they have. Solving this is really easy if you just give us the details of a scenario that supports your statement. Please don't make this personal, there is no need to. I'm only asking you to clarify your position so we can see what exactly you mean. Regards, Austin * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
