On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:49:04 -0600 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> So, we're just about ready to have python3-3.4 built in rawhide. This > package builds fine in EPEL7 too. So, I'm proposing to build (and > hopefully with help from others) maintain python3-3.4 for EPEL. Other > options/considerations: > > - We could build a python34-3.4 which provides python3 = 3.4. This > wou>>> > >>> Perhaps as time goes by, it may make sense to package a later > >>> python3.X version if people really want to.ld allow us to have > >>> multiple > versions concurrently and to conceivably eventually switch a later > version as the default. Not as easy to maintain as just another > branch of the python3 package though. And we could do a hard cut at > some later point with the python3 package method as well, so I'm not > sure it buys us much there either. I'd definitely prefer to try and do something where we aren't stuck with 3.4 for the rest of epel7's life. > - I looks like RedHat has been producing python33 SCLs, and presumably > will produce a python34 SCL eventually. Do we care about this? > Personally I really want to simply be able to build my current Fedora > python packages on EPEL7 with python3 versions just as it is done in > Fedora and I don't think we can do with SCLs. > > So, my preference is for the first and will start that soon unless > there is consensus for a different approach. I think a number of fedora infrastructure folks might have input here, but they are all out at pycon this week... so if you could hold off until next week at least and I will see about pointing them to the thread here? kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel